Case Study 02: Healthtech Startup Valuation in Bangalore, India
- CA Kartikeyan Khator

- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 days ago

Background
Startup Venture B is a Bangalore-based healthtech platform operating in the Ayurveda and integrative healthcare ecosystem. Founded in 2021, the company enables individuals to discover and book consultations, treatment programs, and wellness therapies through an integrated online and offline platform, while also supporting clinics with booking management and data capture tools.
At the time of engagement, Startup Venture B was at a pre-seed stage, with rapidly growing revenues, expanding service lines, and a business model combining platform fees and product-led monetization. The company was preparing to raise capital to scale operations, expand partner clinics, and strengthen its technology and customer acquisition capabilities.
Engagement Objective
The founders engaged Chunder Khator & Associates to undertake an independent valuation discovery exercise in connection with a proposed fundraising round. The objective was to determine a fair and defensible valuation range that could be used as a reference during investor discussions, while appropriately capturing the company’s growth trajectory, sector dynamics, and inherent early-stage risks.
The valuation was carried out specifically for fundraising purposes, and not for statutory or regulatory compliance.
Valuation Challenges
Valuing Startup Venture B involved addressing several complexities typical of early stage healthtech platforms:
Less than ₹1Cr. historical revenue, and recently commercialized model
Rapid revenue growth combined with operating losses during scale-up
Multiple revenue streams with varying margin profiles
High dependence on execution, customer adoption, and clinic network expansion
Limited historical data but strong forward-looking projections
These factors required a valuation approach that balanced forward potential with risk-adjusted realism.
Our Approach
To arrive at a credible valuation range, we adopted a multi-method valuation framework, triangulating value using:
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method
Comparable Transaction Multiple (CTM) Method
Venture Capital (VC) Method
Higher weightage was assigned to the DCF method, as it captured company-specific business projections and long-term scalability, while the CTM and VC methods were used as market and investor-return benchmarks.
Key Valuation Considerations
Investor Return Expectations and Risk Profile - Given the early-stage nature of Startup Venture B, for VCM valuation, investor return expectations were aligned with venture capital benchmarks applicable to early growth investments. A higher expected IRR was assumed to reflect execution risk, sector competition, and the time required to reach sustainable profitability. Assumption relating to dilution of investor's stake over the next 5 years was derived from our proprietary research on the startup ecosystem of India.
Entity-Specific and Liquidity Risk Adjustments - For discount rate used in DCF valuation, additional risk premiums were incorporated to account for factors such as non-marketability of shares, future dilution through subsequent funding rounds, and dependency on continuous capital infusion. These considerations were particularly relevant given the minority, non-controlling nature of the interest being valued.
Comparable Transactions and Market Benchmarking - To ground valuation assumptions in market reality, comparable fundraising transactions involving healthcare booking platforms and digital health companies were analysed under the CTM valuation. These comparables provided insight into valuation multiples applied by investors across similar business models and stages. Here's what the comps table looked like:
Company Name | Sector | Round | Pre-Money Valuation (₹ Cr.) | Forward Revenue (₹ Cr.) | Forward Revenue Multiple |
Practo | Healthcare Booking Platform | Series A | ~25 | ~2.2 | ~11x |
MediBuddy | Healthcare Booking Platform | Angel | ~87 | ~3.1 | ~28x |
Amaha | Healthcare Platform | Series A | ~90 | ~4.5 | ~20x |
Healthians | Healthcare Diagnostics Platform | Series A | ~98 | ~7.2 | ~14x |
CureBay | Healthcare Platform | Series A | ~120 | ~10.4 | ~12x |
Pristyn Care | Healthcare Platform | Series A | ~1,008 | ~25.8 | ~39x |
Sensitivity Analysis and Assumption Testing - Key assumptions - including revenue growth rates, terminal growth, discount rates, and exit multiples - were stress-tested to assess their impact on valuation outcomes. This helped ensure that the final valuation range remained robust across varying scenarios and provided transparency to stakeholders.
Outcome
The valuation exercise resulted in a defensible valuation range that balanced growth potential with investor expectations and risk considerations. The output served as a practical negotiation anchor for fundraising discussions and enabled the founders to articulate value drivers clearly to prospective investors.
Conclusion
This case study highlights how a structured, multi-method approach to healthtech startup valuation in Bangalore can support informed fundraising decisions. At Chunder Khator & Associates, our valuation discovery engagements are designed to deliver clarity, credibility, and confidence, enabling founders and investors to navigate complex valuation discussions with a shared understanding of risk and opportunity. Our valuation services includes:
Valuation Discovery for Fundraise
Valuation Certificates for Compliance
ESOP Valuation
Valuation for Mergers & Acquisitions
Valuation for Financial Reporting
Valuation Review & Second Opinions
Read more about our valuation services here.
You can direct your queries or comments to the authors here.
Disclaimer: The material herein is provided for informational purposes only. The information should not be viewed as professional, legal or other advice. Professional advice should be sought prior to actions on any of the information contained herein. CKA is not responsible for any matter concluded by any person based on the contents of this article.




Comments